Michael Leitman Rewrites the History of Kabbalah

In the introduction to his book “The Gates of Righteousness” Rabbi Yoseph Gikatilla, one of the first and greatest Kabbalists of 13th century Spain, begins with a warning worth heeding: “For the Sages have said: The Lord is most strict with the righteous ones.” Gikatilla tells us a simple thing: God demands the most meticulous adherence from his most righteous followers. Why do I open with this observation? Because I believe we should apply the same principle when we attempt to ascertain whether a certain spiritual teacher is a true guide, or not. And with this admonition I refer to Rabbi Dr. Michael Leitman.

In recent years the Israeli media has been airing, in printed and videotaped form, quite a few dialogues of some celebrity or other with said kabbalist rabbi. In these encounters Leitman assumes the figure of the omniscient sage, leaving his interlocutors to play the part of “He who knows not to ask” – the clueless son from the Haggadah whose father in tasked with “opening for him”, and showing the poor soul the way to the light.

And why celebrities? It appears that the Bnei Baruch movement has become most envious of its elder sibling, The Center for Kabbalah, which sports international superstars such as Madonna and Demi Moore, and also wanted to show that celebrities seeking meaning for their lives are willing to buy its wares. For ten measures of celebrities have descended upon New Age, and if The Kabbalah Center and Scientology hath taken nine among them, Bnei Baruch also coveted a measure of false fame, also desired a measure of the golden calf.

Twenty-two celebrities made pilgrimage to Letiman, speaking with him in meetings that were also filmed and broadcast on the “Karma” channel, from rock star Arkadi Duchin and poets Agi Mishol and Ronnny Somek to MTV veteran Eden Harel, from investigative reporter Gideon Reicher to former IAF Commander Eitan Ben Eliyahu. Recently this series of talks was collated in a book (available for download free of charge here [Heb]), and this is a good opportunity to summarize the reading experience.

Well, bottom line first: The book is full of hogwash as a pomegranate seeds and as usual, the problems begin with presumption. Leitman writes two bad checks: One is the presentation of his method as “science” and the second is his claim to speak for all of Kabbalah. Let us dismantle these claims one by one.

Michael Leitman. Screen picture from the article as it is published on the nrg portal

“A science in every way”

So first, Leitman claims it’s all scientific with him. It’s “Not a philosophy nor a faith,” but “a science in every way” (p. 40). “Kabbalah is a science” (p. 219, and many places besides) he repeats, and proudly tells us that when he explains kabbalah across the great wide world, “scientists understand and accept it” (175). Well, I don’t know what universe the kabbalist rabbi is living in, but even by Leitman’s own testimony, in this very book, one can clearly see that any relation between him and the empirical world as science understands it is purely coincidental.

For instance, Leitman has an alternative history of the Jewish people: According to him, “Abraham was the first kabbalist” (100) and until the destruction of the temple the People of Israel lived as one big kabbalistic community. Upon the destruction “they all fell to worldliness” (132) and began observing the commandments out of compulsion.

The problem is that any history book about the first and second temple periods disproves this fantasy: Jews were never cut of a single cloth, and were always divided and conflicted internally, and most of the time actually worshiped idols. Truth is, you don’t need a history book for that – it’s enough to read the bible.

But the kabbalist doctor deals not only in rewriting history, but also in denying modern research. It is of course his right to refuse to be impressed by findings that place the time of the Zohar’s writing in the 13th century; but not to say a single word about how his traditional approach, which he repeats several times and which holds that Rabbi Shimon Bar Yochai wrote the book in the second century, lies in stark contrast to research consensus, is not a behavior consistent with scientific standards. Leitman relies on the ignorance of his readers on these matters and feeds them falsehoods.

By the way, this rhetorical trick where you call your fabrications “science” was known back in the days of Rudolph Steiner, the founder of Anthroposophy, in the early twentieth century, and it is still with us today with movements such as Transcendental Meditation and Scientology. Everyone wants some of the wonderful translucence of science to rub off on them, and Leitman is simply towing the line of other movements and sects. On the other hand, since Leitman apparently was a scientist before becoming a kabbalist (He claims to have been in bio-cybernetics,) one could have expected a little more scientific integrity from him.

The Kabbalah?

It’s not only the scientific pretension that knocks holes in the rabbi’s credibility, but also his presenting his method as the Kabbalah. Leitman is erudite enough to know that besides the school of thought he represents there are many different others, each rooted in the immensely rich fountain of kabbalistic wisdom. Taking sole credit for this popular brand is a little much.

I mean, is it “Kabbalah” that claims that has always claimed that “the basic laws are the result of human thought” (106) – or in other words, a Jewish version of “The Secret”? Of course not. Did “Kabbalah” always claim that reward and punishment “mean nothing” and that common man has no free choice (117)? Of course not. Did “Kabbalah” always talk about how “observing commandments is beside the point” (27), meaning its adherents don’t need to observe Halakhic laws? Guess.

Just to make clear, I am in no way claiming that what Leitman teaches isn’t Kabbalah. Kabbalah isn’t static and like anything else, including Judaism itself, it changes with time (although it is true that the scope of this change is rather surprising.) It’s just that Leitman’s presumption to be the sole representative of Kabbalah is simply inappropriate, and borders on fraud.

At the same time Leitman repeats the well-known claptrap about how “science is now discovering facts that Kabbalah has been relying upon for thousands of years. Well, rabbi, here’s a newsflash: Kabbalah hasn’t existed for thousands of years. It originated in the 13th century. That’s what science has discovered. And if indeed Kabbalah knows facts that science has yet to discover, please don’t hold back: Tell us one provable or disprovable new fact, and I promise that we’ll all be very proud to escort you to the Nobel Prize ceremony in Stockholm.

So Leitman takes the name of both Kabbalah and science in vain. He feeds his listeners with fables as he baselessly pretends to global wisdom and complete certainty. He presents himself as a font of Kabbalic knowledge, and his listeners as babes in the woods who crawl to him to suck their fill. In the end they receive nothing more than a thin potion brewed by a witch-doctor.

Oh, by the way, anyone buying the book to understand anything about Kabbalah will be disappointed, since it says almost nothing about the teachings themselves, only about how good and wise and ancient and scientific those teachings are. Indeed, it appears that the book is not meant to introduce us to Leitman’s Kabbalah, but rather to famous people who are themselves trying to understand Leitman’s Kabbalah.

One last word, also having to do with false pretension: According to Leitman “all methods, save for Kabbalah, are based on the oppression of man” (29). I’m sorry, but the way to freedom from oppression begins and ends in knowledge of the truth. A road spun from fables and false pretensions cannot possibly lead there.

This article was first published on the 12/6/2008 on the Maariv-nrg site. Wow, that was some time ago. But all is still relevant, I assure you. Translated by Rechavia Berman.


9 Responses to “Michael Leitman Rewrites the History of Kabbalah”

  1. 1 fatma 03/07/2013 at 00:01

    Mr. Tomer in the beging, i’ll use one of laitman coutation “what ever you say by using asn languge; i get it by my soul”. i guess your words so hard in this article, Eample:a- we cann’t say witch in scines method because we live in 21th century that make different between both.
    b- there are hundered of people in a world read and belive in his thoughs and his movement “bni-baruch”.
    c- may be laitman is far a way from hallakh and bibble but this rules shape to another jews movement.
    d- all of his teaches on kabbalh help his target “Judaization” and to arrive to the kindess world “Malakuh”.

    • 2 תומר פרסיקו 03/07/2013 at 06:42

      Dear Fatma,
      Thank you for your comment. As I wrote, I am not in any way saying that what Leitman is teaching is not “Kabbalah”. But I don’t think that we cannot say what is science and what isn’t, even if we are in the 21st century. Of course, science or not, Leitman does have a great effect on thousands of people, that’s true.

  2. 3 Anonymous 23/10/2013 at 17:19

    I enjoyed your review. R.

  3. 4 tillerofthesoil 31/10/2013 at 06:54

    This is a quite a harsh critique of Laitman. Academic scholars of Kabbalah can’t accept that Laitman adopts a rhetoric which is addressed to the masses. Therefore of course he doesn’t present the history of the Jewish People and Kabbalah according to a scholarly consensus.

    One thing can be said for Laitman’s organization Bnei Baruch: they offer their materials free of charge unlike the Kabbalah Center of the Berg family.

    I think the life story of Philip Berg was a little like the unfaithful raven, see here: http://wp.me/p2ImMP-n5.

  4. 5 Paul J. 14/02/2014 at 01:22

    While I have attained many new advancements through his teachings, what he has recieved from above is not so much as he feigns- Michael Leitman’s explanation of the soul, it’s gender, what it is, is not, can be, who has one, and even how many, is so ambiguous one might as well not EVER have one!

  5. 6 Paul J. 14/02/2014 at 02:27

    In another thread written by you, you coincidentally discover, and speak of the death of Phillip Berg as follows –

    “If I were into Kabbalah I would of course have deduced that this is no coincidence, but rather a sign and an omen and message and a signal, but I’m not really into that, and so I won’t deduce.”

    For one who is not “into Kabbalah” and is “not really into that” you have certainly “deduced” quite a lot of complex opinion.

    While I enjoy sharing opinions about Kabbalah with you and others, I get a little bummed out by all the 100’s of people out there with so much judgment and reductive explanation about it, but then discover that they have not even experienced the wonder of receiving it’s gnosis, and are not even interested in it, except to beat up on various different Kabbalist’s, or Kabbalah in general.

    Why do you think that is? Why do people who do not even believe in something, spend so much time attacking it? I’ve always been amazed to discover that Atheists are more obsessed with G-d than I am!

    I’ve never been to France, so I’m inclined to say very little about it’s people, customs exc. However, I HAVE had many gnostic experiences via Kabbalah, so I speak on these things somewhat; as one who has “received” it’s transmission.

  6. 7 Benyamin 23/02/2014 at 07:42

    Good article, though I strongly disagree that Kabbalah was “created” in 13 century – it was indeed revealed in clearer form than before, but not originated at this time. Just as everything else Moshe received it from Sinai. There are many books that show how Tanaim and Amoraim were depicting deep mystical concepts in Mishnah and Talmud while concealing them behind “simple stories”.

  7. 8 Dan 14/09/2014 at 05:21

    Rav Laitman quotes the book “Chapters of Rabbi Eleazar” to say that Abraham was given the wisdom and tried to disseminated to people, etc.

  8. 9 Anonymous 20/12/2016 at 08:08

    The Sefer yetzirah,bahir.. ancient texts.

write a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Tomer Persico

“The blog of one of the conference participants, Tomer Persico, has made him one of the most consistently interesting observers of Israeli religious life.”

Yehudah Mirsky, "Aquarius in Zion", Jewish Ideas Daily, 17.5.12

Interested in booking Tomer for a talk or program? Be in touch with the Jewish Speakers Bureau

Join 2,841 other followers


%d bloggers like this: